MCF-stack: Special Solutions of Mean Curvature Flow

§ 2.12 Cisgeminate-eye shrinkerAAF58D62FB97

Earliest recorded reference: (first arXiv submission).

Paper credits and chronology

Paper credits are chronological and include every author of the cited papers. They identify sources, not exclusive discovery credit. Background-only citations do not determine the date of this example. A classical example may predate the references recorded here.

  1. Chang–Lue — 2019-01-29 (first arXiv submission).
AAF58D62FB97
8E8F9B32C891

This planar network has the regular two-region configuration classified by Chang–Lue. Its branches satisfy $\mathbf k=-X^\perp /2$, and three branches meet at each junction at angles $2\pi /3$. The associated network flow is $\sqrt{-t}\, \Gamma $, $-\infty <t<0$. Exterior straight rays pass through the shrinker center when extended. The network is embedded in the network sense: branches intersect only at the specified junctions; it is not a smooth immersed curve at those junctions. An arclength branch can be computed from $x'=\cos \theta $, $y'=\sin \theta $, $\theta '=(x\sin \theta -y\cos \theta )/2$, subject to global closing and junction conditions. These conditions, rather than arbitrary shooting data, define the example. The cited papers establish the relevant existence or classification. The no-theta-network result must not be confused with existence of the cisgeminate eye. No exhaustive classification of networks with arbitrarily many regions is claimed. The complete noncompact network has finitely many bounded arcs and rays, so its Gaussian area and entropy are finite. Surface genus is inapplicable. Where the figure uses a symmetric shooting solution it reports numerical junction residuals; asymmetric configurations are explicitly labeled construction diagrams. Time scaling is exact in either picture, but does not turn a schematic profile into a solved shrinker.

Sources: [ChangLue2019].

Cisgeminate-eye shrinker. Three times on common axes. Source-based junction diagram; curved arcs are schematic, not a solved shrinker profile.
Source-informed network schematic. Three times on common axes. Source-based junction diagram; curved arcs are schematic, not a solved shrinker profile. Open drawing · Numerical references and credits

Ambient space, topology, embeddedness and entropy

Source construction and dimension restrictions are stated on the reading page. Illustrations have their own accuracy labels.

Regular planar network · Euclidean plane ℝ² · Embedded
Ambient space
Euclidean plane ℝ²
Topology
Two bounded four-sided cells sharing an edge, with four exterior rays
Embeddedness
Embedded: Embedded as a network with prescribed 120-degree triple junctions, not a smooth curve there.
Compactness
Noncompact
Surface genus
Not a smooth surface; surface genus is inapplicable.
Topological ends
Four exterior rays.
Entropy
Finite; value not recorded: Finite on each stated smooth slice; no numerical value or uniform time bound is recorded.
Gaussian area
Finite; value not recorded: Finite on each stated smooth slice; no numerical value or uniform time bound is recorded.

Compare examples by these properties →

References on this page

  1. [ChangLue2019] Jui-En Chang and Yang-Kai Lue. Uniqueness of regular shrinkers with 2 closed regions. arXiv preprint, 2019. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10315, arXiv:1901.10315.All uses in this project ↩ 1
Cite this page

Comments

Comments are not enabled yet.