MCF-stack: Special Solutions of Mean Curvature Flow

§ 2.15 Chopp octahedral shrinker candidateEAAEF7E5907F

Earliest recorded reference: (publication year).

Paper credits and chronology

Paper credits are chronological and include every author of the cited papers. They identify sources, not exclusive discovery credit. Background-only citations do not determine the date of this example. A classical example may predate the references recorded here.

  1. Chopp — 1994 (publication year).
EAAEF7E5907F
5D3FB6DFEE3F

(Numerical genus-seven octahedron) Chopp computes a closed genus-seven shrinker candidate in $\mathbb R^3$ by starting with a sphere bored in the eight directions $(\pm 1,\pm 1,\pm 1)$. There are four drilling axes and eight openings into the central cavity. The candidate has octahedral symmetry, dimension two and codimension one; its intended topology is a closed orientable surface of genus seven.

The construction is numerical level-set evolution with dilation and level selection. It supplies neither a closed formula nor a proof of an exact solution. In normalized coordinates the target is $\vec H=-X^\perp /2$, with the proposed flow $M_ t=\sqrt{-t}\, \Sigma $ for $t<0$. The conversion from the paper's scale is described in Example 2.14. The intended surface is compact, embedded and without boundary, hence would be complete and proper with no ends if realized as a smooth surface. These attributes describe the numerical candidate, not a proved shrinker.

Section 4.2 reports $E=0.0197$ for the self-similarity diagnostic and approximate shape preservation under further MCF. Figure 13 uses an $80\times 80\times 80$ grid. No certified convergence theorem, uniqueness, curvature classification, stability spectrum, Gaussian area or entropy value is given for this computed surface. See [Chopp1994], Section 4.2, pp. 7–9, Figures 13–15. The suggestion there that other regular polyhedra should yield shrinkers is a conjectural extension, not additional computed examples. The schematic shows the eight passages and genus seven. Later Platonic constructions are recorded separately in Examples 2.36 and 2.27; sharing a symmetry does not identify those surfaces with Chopp's candidate.

Original topology schematic: genus 7, closed. Chopp’s paper reports a numerical candidate; this drawing is not his mesh and does not solve the shrinker equation. Scale and neck shapes are illustrative. Use the cutaway to see the central cavity.
Schematic of a numerical candidate. Original topology schematic: genus 7, closed. Chopp’s paper reports a numerical candidate; this drawing is not his mesh and does not solve the shrinker equation. Scale and neck shapes are illustrative. Use the cutaway to see the central cavity. Open drawing · Numerical references and credits

Ambient space, topology, embeddedness and entropy

Numerical shrinker candidate, not a proved existence result for this computed surface. Topology and compactness describe the intended surface; the drawing is schematic.

Numerical candidate: Chopp octahedral shrinker candidate · Euclidean space ℝ³ · Not recorded
Ambient space
Euclidean space ℝ³
Topology
Intended orientable genus-7 surface without punctures (closed)
Embeddedness
Not recorded: The target is embedded and the numerical construction uses embedded level sets, but existence of an exact embedded shrinker with these properties is not proved in the reviewed computation.
Compactness
Compact
Surface genus
7, the topology of the numerical candidate
Topological ends
0, for the intended complete surface; finite-window boundaries are not ends
Entropy
Not recorded: No entropy value or bound established for this numerical candidate. The self-similarity diagnostic E is not entropy.
Gaussian area
Not recorded: No normalized centered Gaussian area recorded; do not infer it from the drawing or identify it with entropy for an approximate surface.

Compare examples by these properties →

References on this page

  1. [Chopp1994] David L. Chopp. Computation of self-similar solutions for mean curvature flow. Experimental Mathematics, 3(1):1–15, 1994. Journal scan reviewed in full. Five numerical candidates in Sections 4.1–4.4 and 4.6; the four-handled dumbbell in Section 4.5 fails the self-similarity test. No existence proof is supplied. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.1994.10504572, doi:10.1080/10586458.1994.10504572.All uses in this project ↩ 1
Cite this page

Comments

Comments are not enabled yet.