MCF-stack: Special Solutions of Mean Curvature Flow

Chapter 3

Translators2760875656EF

Eternal translating solutions: explicit graphs, numerical rotational models, and geometric constructions with precise references.

Background

Translation as a geometric evolution

A translator is a submanifold whose mean curvature flow moves with a constant ambient velocity. For a smooth $n$-dimensional submanifold $\Sigma\subset\mathbb R^N$ and a constant vector $V$, the equation and associated flow are

\[ \begin{gathered}\vec H=V^\perp,\\ M_t=\Sigma+tV,\qquad t\in\mathbb R.\end{gathered} \]

Only the normal component of the velocity changes the evolving image. We use $\vec H=\Delta_\Sigma X$ and, for hypersurfaces, $\vec H=-H\nu$. After a rotation and a spatial scaling, a nonzero translation velocity can be normalized to $V=e_{n+1}$ in $\mathbb R^{n+1}$. The magnitude of the velocity is not preserved by dilation: dilating space by $a>0$ changes the speed to $|V|/a$. The examples below use unit upward translation unless another convention is stated.

Translators are eternal solutions, but eternal existence does not imply translation. They are stationary when viewed in a frame moving with $V$. A minimal hypersurface invariant under translation in the $V$ direction is a stationary special case, since $V^\perp=0$. There is no compact boundaryless Euclidean translator with $V\ne0$: the height $h=\langle X,V\rangle$ satisfies $\Delta_\Sigma h=|V^\perp|^2$, so integration on a compact domain would force $\vec H=0$, which is impossible for a compact boundaryless positive-dimensional Euclidean immersion.

Type II models and backward limits

A finite-time singularity is Type I if $\sup_{M_t}|A|^2\leq C/(T-t)$ near its singular time, and Type II if no such bound holds. In Type II analysis, one magnifies around high-curvature points at their curvature scale. Suitable compactness estimates can produce ancient or eternal limits. Translators are important examples of such limits, but a curvature rescaling alone does not prove that the limit translates. Convexity, noncollapsing, Harnack inequalities, or a classification theorem provide the additional information.

The degenerate neckpinches of Angenent–Velázquez provide a concrete link between finite-time singularity formation and translating tip models (AV97, Introduction). The bowl is particularly important in convex flow. Brendle–Choi prove that every noncompact ancient solution in $\mathbb R^3$ that is strictly convex and uniformly two-sided noncollapsed is a bowl flow, up to scaling and ambient isometries (BrendleChoi19, Theorem 1.1). Noncollapsing means that interior and exterior tangent balls have radii at least $\alpha/H$ for a uniform $\alpha>0$. Dropping these hypotheses changes the classification problem.

The introduction of Sun–Wang emphasizes another connection: a finite-entropy translator can be studied by taking a parabolic limit of its eternal flow as time tends to $-\infty$. Its backward tangent flow is self-shrinking and splits off the translation direction, in the precise weak formulation of their Corollary 2.4. Thus the large-scale geometry of a translator is linked to a shrinker of one lower dimension. This limit may have multiplicity, and the statement does not assert that every translator has a smooth or uniquely determined shrinker profile (SunWang2025, Sections 1–2).

Graphs, weighted minimality, and basic models

For unit upward translation, a graph $(x,u(x)+t)$ over a domain $\Omega\subset\mathbb R^n$ satisfies

\[ \operatorname{div}\!\left(\frac{Du}{\sqrt{1+|Du|^2}}\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+|Du|^2}}. \]

In dimension one this yields the exact grim reaper $u(x)=-\log\cos x$, with $|x|<\pi/2$. The finite strip width is compatible with completeness because the height diverges at the boundary. In dimensions $n\geq2$, the rotational entire graph $u(x)=f(|x|)$ satisfies

\[ \frac{f''}{1+(f')^2}+\frac{n-1}{r}f'=1,\qquad f(0)=f'(0)=0. \]

This regular ODE defines the bowl. Its quadratic leading term, $r^2/(2(n-1))$, describes its growth but does not give the exact surface. Clutterbuck–Schnürer–Schulze establish the profile asymptotics and dynamical stability for graphical initial data whose height difference from the bowl tends to zero at spatial infinity (CSS07, Theorem 1.1 and Section 2). A theorem for this asymptotic class is not stability under unrestricted perturbations.

Translators are also critical points, for compactly supported variations, of the weighted area

\[ \mathcal I_V(\Sigma)=\int_\Sigma e^{\langle V,X\rangle}\,d\mu. \]

Indeed, the first variation in a normal direction $W$ is $\int_\Sigma\langle V^\perp-\vec H,W\rangle e^{\langle V,X\rangle}\,d\mu$. The integral may be infinite on a complete translator; the local variational equation still makes sense. For a hypersurface, the normal Jacobi operator is $\Delta_\Sigma+\langle V^T,\nabla_\Sigma\cdot\rangle+|A|^2$. On a translating graph, the positive vertical normal component provides the stability function. This is weighted stability, distinct from stability for ordinary area or from convergence of the time-dependent flow (HIMWGraphical18, Section 2).

Classification and the range of constructions

Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White classify complete translating graphs in $\mathbb R^3$: after normalizing the velocity and allowing the appropriate rigid motions, the possibilities are the bowl, grim-reaper cylinders and their tilted versions, and strictly convex $\Delta$-wings. A $\Delta$-wing exists on each strip of width greater than $\pi$ and is unique up to translation for that width. The theorem concerns graphs over domains perpendicular to the translation direction; it is not a classification of all complete embedded translators (HIMWGraphical18, Introduction and Theorem 1.1).

Outside the graphical class, annular translating catenoids, Scherk-type surfaces, pitchforks, and gluing constructions have different topology and end geometry. The analogy with minimal surfaces is useful because both problems have elliptic variational formulations, but a minimal surface does not become a translator merely by adding a constant velocity. The survey HIMWNotes19 explains these constructions and the limits of the analogy. Higher dimensions also admit convex translators beyond the rotational bowl, as in Xu-Jia Wang's work (XJWang11, Introduction). Dimension, convexity, and graphicality must therefore accompany every uniqueness statement.

Prescribing the shrinker at infinity

Sun–Wang turn the backward-limit question into a construction. Given a smooth closed embedded shrinker $S^{n-1}\subset\mathbb R^n$ of Gaussian Morse index $I$, they construct an $I$-parameter family of complete embedded translators in $\mathbb R^{n+1}$ with unique multiplicity-one backward tangent flow $S\times\mathbb R$. The construction is smooth for $n\leq6$; in higher dimensions it allows a singular set of dimension at most $n-7$. The prescribed asymptotics do not determine a unique translator, and their fattening construction gives further nonuniqueness (SunWang2025, Theorem 1.1 and Section 1.3).

For this correspondence, the cross-sectional shrinker and the translator have different dimensions. A genus-one surface in $\mathbb R^3$ supplies asymptotic data for a three-dimensional translator in $\mathbb R^4$; its surface genus is not a genus assigned to the entire translator. Likewise, a backward parabolic limit is different from an unscaled cylindrical end. The catalogue records the precise end description, regularity range, topology, and entropy information for each construction. These distinctions make it possible to compare examples without turning a particular asymptotic classification into a universal one.

Examples by ambient dimension

Each family is placed once, at its lowest recorded ambient dimension. Links in later groups lead to its cases in those dimensions. These are the spaces stated in the construction; parameter restrictions remain in the linked cases.

Within each dimension group, examples follow their earliest recorded reference, including first arXiv submissions. These dates describe the references recorded here, not necessarily the original discovery. Parenthetical author groups credit the cited papers in chronological order.

Euclidean plane ℝ²

  1. 3.1 The grim reaper and its cylinders (Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2018; Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2019)505486401C44Earliest recorded reference: 2018-05-28Also in ℝ³ · ℝ⁴ · Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)

Euclidean space ℝ³

  1. 3.2 The rotational bowl translator (Clutterbuck–Schnürer–Schulze, 2005; Brendle–Choi, 2017; Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2019; Sun–Zhihan Wang, 2023)38B2DD284E09Earliest recorded reference: 2005-09-16Also in ℝ⁴ · Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  2. 3.3 Rotational translating catenoids (Clutterbuck–Schnürer–Schulze, 2005; Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2019)FEA31DEDC853Earliest recorded reference: 2005-09-16Also in ℝ⁴ · Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  3. 3.4 Periodic translating tridents (X. H. Nguyen, 2009; Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2019; Hoffman–Martín–White, 2019)31505E08B028Earliest recorded reference: 2009
  4. 3.5 Translators from grim-reaper configurations (X. H. Nguyen, 2010; X. H. Nguyen, 2012)E83F92A45A1FEarliest recorded reference: 2010-04-15
  5. 3.6 Halldorsson helicoidal rotating translators0FA3E75DD419Earliest recorded reference: 2011-06-22
  6. 3.7 Finite-genus translators with three ends (Dávila–del Pino–X. H. Nguyen, 2015; Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2019)8609A35E7601Earliest recorded reference: 2015-01-16
  7. 3.8 Tilted grim-reaper cylinders9A8E5E528EEBEarliest recorded reference: 2018-05-28Also in ℝ⁴ · Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  8. 3.9 Strictly convex delta-wing translators9BBF93D61D7AEarliest recorded reference: 2018-05-28
  9. 3.10 Translators with prescribed apex curvaturesDCD9F7224DF3Earliest recorded reference: 2018-05-28Also in ℝ⁴ · Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  10. 3.11 Scherkenoid translators (Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2019; Hoffman–Martín–White, 2019)9E847D647A0CEarliest recorded reference: 2019-01-25
  11. 3.12 The pitchfork translator (Hoffman–Ilmanen–Martín–White, 2019; Hoffman–Martín–White, 2019; Gama–Martín–Møller, 2022; Martín–Sáez–Tsiamis–White, 2024)64055D697644Earliest recorded reference: 2019-01-25
  12. 3.13 Doubly periodic Scherk translators (Hoffman–Martín–White, 2019; Martín–Sáez–Tsiamis–White, 2024)73DEA085F2F9Earliest recorded reference: 2019-03-11
  13. 3.14 Helicoid-like translators (Hoffman–Martín–White, 2019; Martín–Sáez–Tsiamis–White, 2024)0147E53C30CEEarliest recorded reference: 2019-03-11
  14. 3.15 Annuloid translators in slabs (Gama–Martín–Møller, 2022; Hoffman–Martín–White, 2023)93A7D23F7FA3Earliest recorded reference: 2023-08-04

Euclidean space ℝ⁴

  1. 3.16 Nonrotational entire convex translatorsBD00A99565D1Earliest recorded reference: 2004-04-19Also in Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  2. 3.17 Joyce–Lee–Tsui small-angle Lagrangian translators16AF28E8CCDBEarliest recorded reference: 2008-01-24Also in Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  3. 3.18 Explicit rotating Lagrangian translators5C21E6709CA8Earliest recorded reference: 2008-01-24Also in Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  4. 3.19 Castro–Lerma Lagrangian translators from curve pairs14F0E7012E88Earliest recorded reference: 2010-07-12
  5. 3.20 Convex slab translators with polyhedral asymptotics2F596CC616F1Earliest recorded reference: 2020-06-29Also in Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)
  6. 3.21 Translators with an embedded rotational shrinking-torus end (Angenent, 1992; Sun–Zhihan Wang, 2023)C8173134CEA6Earliest recorded reference: 2023-01-19
  7. 3.22 Translators with high-genus spherical-doubling ends (Kapouleas–McGrath, 2020; Sun–Zhihan Wang, 2023)A0A7AC0D200CEarliest recorded reference: 2023-01-19
  8. 3.23 Translators with general closed-shrinker endsC44A1D57ECC3Earliest recorded reference: 2023-01-19Also in Higher dimensions (N ≥ 5)

Euclidean dimension ≥ 5

  1. 3.24 Su translators obtained by gluing grim cylinders96393C1B9F17Earliest recorded reference: 2020-11-16
  2. 3.25 Su–Wood Lagrangian translating helicoids405ACD56C839Earliest recorded reference: 2025-07-02
  3. 3.26 Su–Wood paired-profile translators31FE1060BFF7Earliest recorded reference: 2025-07-02
  4. 3.27 Nonconvex entire graphical translators2E699B408ADAEarliest recorded reference: 2026-09-04

Riemannian ambient manifold

  1. 3.28 Rotational translators in the hyperbolic-plane productE33234341F7DEarliest recorded reference: 2018-03-07
  2. 3.29 Invariant translators in the Heisenberg group750539FAA8AFEarliest recorded reference: 2018-11-12
  3. 3.30 Invariant translators in Sol geometry2BC769F3A4ADEarliest recorded reference: 2019-06-19
  4. 3.31 Graphical translators over compact symmetric spaces (Fujii, 2021; Fujii–Koike, 2023)1102596C432BEarliest recorded reference: 2021-09-30
  5. 3.32 Hyperbolic Killing translators and catenoids (de Lima–Ramos–dos Santos, 2023; de Lima–Ramos, 2026)EA9BCA366717Earliest recorded reference: 2023-07-26
  6. 3.33 Helicoidal rotators-translators in the hyperbolic-plane product65C371A89575Earliest recorded reference: 2024-02-07
  7. 3.34 Grim reapers in the hyperbolic-plane productFB29EFBDEAE7Earliest recorded reference: 2024-02-08
  8. 3.35 Parabolic Killing grim reapers in hyperbolic space2C2BD4493223Earliest recorded reference: 2024-02-08
  9. 3.36 Invariant translators in the special linear group9C3485CD7693Earliest recorded reference: 2024-05-24

References on this page

  1. [AV97] Sigurd B. Angenent and Juan J. L. Velázquez. Degenerate neckpinches in mean curvature flow. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 482:15–66, 1997. Printed page = supplied PDF page + 14. Odd m at least 3 is the constructed family used here; asymptotic profiles are not exact time-dependent formulas. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1997.482.15, doi:10.1515/crll.1997.482.15.All uses in this project ↩ 1
  2. [BrendleChoi19] Simon Brendle and Kyeongsu Choi. Uniqueness of convex ancient solutions to mean curvature flow in R3. Inventiones Mathematicae, 217:35–76, 2019. Supplied journal edition; Theorem 1.1 is on printed page 36, PDF page 2. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-019-00859-4, doi:10.1007/s00222-019-00859-4.All uses in this project ↩ 1
  3. [SunWang2025] Ao Sun and Zhihan Wang. On mean curvature flow translators with prescribed ends. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 2025. Source locators refer to arXiv version 2, posted 20 August 2025, 45 pages. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08224v2, arXiv:2301.08224, doi:10.1007/s00205-025-02125-9.All uses in this project ↩ 1 ↩ 2
  4. [CSS07] Julie Clutterbuck, Oliver C. Schnürer, and Felix Schulze. Stability of translating solutions to mean curvature flow. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 29(3):281–293, 2007. Citations use the author-hosted September 2005 manuscript, 12 pages. URL: https://www.math.uni-konstanz.de/~schnuere/fub/ocs019.pdf, doi:10.1007/s00526-006-0033-1.All uses in this project ↩ 1
  5. [HIMWGraphical18] David Hoffman, Tom Ilmanen, Francisco Martín, and Brian White. Graphical translators for mean curvature flow. 2018. Supplied 28-page preprint dated July 5, 2018. Catalogue locators refer to this edition. The inverted ratio in Theorem 2.4 is corrected using equation (1.4). URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10860v2.All uses in this project ↩ 1 ↩ 2
  6. [HIMWNotes19] David Hoffman, Tom Ilmanen, Francisco Martín, and Brian White. Notes on translating solitons for mean curvature flow. 2019. Supplied 20-page manuscript dated January 29, 2019; catalogue citations use its PDF page numbers, not the later published edition. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.09101.All uses in this project ↩ 1
  7. [XJWang11] Xu-Jia Wang. Convex solutions to the mean curvature flow. Annals of Mathematics, 173(3):1185–1239, 2011. Supplied journal edition. Translator examples use sigma equals one; the zero case concerns level-set flow. URL: https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2011.173.3.1, doi:10.4007/annals.2011.173.3.1.All uses in this project ↩ 1
Cite this page

Comments

Comments are not enabled yet.