3CC118326D79
(Cohomogeneity-two special Lagrangians) Let $m\geq 3$, $d=m-1$, $I=(-\pi /(2d),\pi /(2d))$, $\mu _1,\mu _2>0$, and $\varphi \in \mathbb R$. Define
For $u\in S^{m-2}\subset \mathbb R^{m-1}$ and $(x,y)\in I^2$, put
This is an exact integral parametrization of an embedded, exact special Lagrangian of dimension and codimension $m$. Thus $\vec H=0$ and $L_ t=X(S^{m-2}\times I^2)$ for every $t\in \mathbb R$. It is the $G=SO(m-1)$ case of [SuWood2026], equation (31), Theorem 5.6, Proposition 5.9 and Remark 5.10. It has cohomogeneity two under this group; for $m=3$ the topology is $S^1\times \mathbb R^2$, not a surface annulus.
The topology in general is $S^{m-2}\times \mathbb R^2$, with one end. The parametrization is proper: approaching either endpoint of $I$ makes $|\ell (x)\ell (y)|$ diverge, and the remaining factor $u$ is compact. The induced metric is therefore complete. The calibrated image is stable under compactly supported variations. No entropy value or global asymptotic classification is recorded here.
For the illustrated case $m=3$, write $s=\arctan (\tanh q)$. Then
Thus equation (31) has a closed elementary form in this dimension. Fix $\mu _1=1$, $\mu _2=\mu >0$, and $\varphi =0$. For $(p,b)\in \mathbb R^2$, set $a=\operatorname {arsinh}p$ and
The full stationary flow is
This is a reparametrization of the displayed construction, obtained by putting the two hyperbolic profile parameters equal to $(a-b)/2$ and $(a+b)/2$. For $\mu =1$, the profile projection is particularly simple:
The figure samples these exact formulas on $|p|\leq 2$, $|b|\leq 1.2$. The snapshots at $t=-2,0,2$ coincide, including their spatial scale and marked parameter point: $\partial _ tX_ t=\vec H=0$. The circle view adds sampled spatial $SO(2)$ orbits. Changing $\mu $, the orbit angle, or the projection changes the example or its view, not its mean curvature flow. The colored sheet is a two-dimensional profile, not the entire three-manifold and not a surface mean curvature flow in $\mathbb R^3$.
The same paper constructs translators from a line and an Anciaux shrinker profile, and from an expander/shrinker pair. The line/expander case recovers the symmetric Joyce–Lee–Tsui translator of Example 3.17; it is not a second catalogue entry. For other symmetry groups some constructions have a one-dimensional singular set, so their smooth embeddedness must not be inferred from this $SO(m-1)$ case.
Comments
Comments are not enabled yet.