DE8829990703
(Infinite-time curvature blow-up with vanishing mean curvature) Use the Gibbons–Hawking setting of [LeeTsai2026], Section 2: the circle quotient contains the collinear centers $(a_ j,0,0)$ with $-1=a_1<\cdots <a_ N=1$, $N\geq 3$, and
The regular part is smooth, nonnegative, and harmonic on the source's quotient neighborhood. Let the initial Lagrangian sphere be the smooth circle lift of a positive concave graph $(x,u_0(x),0)$ joining the outer centers, with $u_0(\pm 1)=0$. For fixed $\Lambda >0$, require the small-slope and curvature conditions of Theorem 6.2:
where $c$ is sufficiently large as supplied by that theorem. The reduced equation is
The lifted flow exists smoothly for $t\geq 0$, remains a compact embedded sphere, and converges to the $A_{N-1}$ chain of $N-1$ special Lagrangian spheres. Theorem 6.2 proves
Finite-time slices have genus zero, no ends, and are complete and proper. Junctions occur only in the infinite-time limit. The quotient evolves by the weighted equation above, not ordinary planar curve shortening; Euclidean entropy is inapplicable. The coauthor is Ping-Hung Lee, distinct from Tang-Kai Lee.
The illustration integrates the quotient PDE numerically for $N=4$, $a_ j=-1+2(j-1)/3$, $\varphi _{\rm reg}=0$, and $u_0(x)=0.06(1-x^2)$, on $0\leq t\leq 12$. Its finite-time snapshots are separate from the theoretical limit $t\to \infty $. Mesh refinement checks numerical consistency; the chosen initial coefficient is not certified against the existential smallness constant in Theorem 6.2.
To interpret the diagram, the circle over $(x,u(x,t),0)$ has radius factor
The rendered surface $(x,r_{\rm orb}\cos \theta ,r_{\rm orb}\sin \theta )$, $0\leq \theta <2\pi $, records these fiber sizes; it is not an isometric embedding of $L_ t$ in Euclidean three-space. The outer fibers collapse at every time, closing a sphere. The two interior fibers stay positive at finite times. In the limit, each interval $[a_ j,a_{j+1}]$ lifts to a special Lagrangian sphere, with adjacent spheres meeting transversely in the four-manifold. The displayed contact angles have no geometric meaning. Remark 6.3 relates the neck size to $\| u(\cdot ,t)\| _{C^0}^{1/2}$ and to $(\max |A|)^{-1}$, explaining why small quotient height accompanies large curvature.
Comments
Comments are not enabled yet.